- Beijing is bracing for repercussions following the coronavirus, but it is determined to maintain China’s integral role in the global economy
- Realignment of global value chains will speed up post-crisis, but China can leverage its advanced infrastructure and industrial capabilities, experts say
This is the third in a series of five stories exploring the global backlash that China may face as a result of its actions and rhetoric during the coronavirus pandemic. This story examines the outlook for China’s economy as it recovers from the outbreak, including the risk that its place in the global value chain may be fundamentally altered as a result of the pandemic.
Consensus is growing in Beijing that the coronavirus pandemic is set to make the world more hostile towards China, undermining the accommodating international environment that underpinned the country’s spectacular rise from a closed communist backwater into a global economic powerhouse.
One of the most pressing challenges facing the central government will be the acceleration of a global value chain realignment, which may hit China’s job market in the short term and marginalise the country’s long-term role in the global economy, according to Chinese researchers and analysts.
China may have had four times as many cases as official figure, study says
While Beijing is politically and ideologically at odds with Western liberal democracies, it is determined to stay embedded within the global market.
Whether China can maintain its position in the global economy or ends up isolated after the pandemic is brought under control, will be one the most important questions post-crisis.
The future production landscape would be dotted with “production bases” – areas with a radius of 50km to 200km (31 miles to 124 miles) where 70 per cent of a value chain’s core parts and semi-finished products would be concentrated, he said. These areas, with easy access to global transport networks and located in favourable business environments, will be the future, the former mayor said.
China, with its advanced infrastructure and industrial capabilities, has the chance to elevate its role in the global economy as long as it can prove it is sincere about opening up to the outside world, Huang said.
“The pandemic has exposed weak links in the old globalisation model … China and other countries must rethink and readjust global industrial layout,” Huang said.
“However, the adjustment is not total negation of globalisation … such a move would be shooting one’s own foot,” he said. “The right approach is to open further, instead of taking a 180-degree turn.”
Huang’s view is in line with Beijing’s pledge that China will remain investor-friendly and open its market further to foreign businesses. Samsung, for instance, has received special approval to send 200 workers to Xi’an, the capital of Shaanxi province, to complete the expansion of its chip manufacturing plant there.
While threats about decoupling and isolating China are grabbing headlines, the nation remains the world’s biggest manufacturer and the world’s largest consumer market – something that is not lost on multinationals.
“Elon Musk danced in public when the first Model 3 was delivered this year – you can see how happy he was,” said Chen Fengying, the former director of the World Economy Institute at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations.
“China remains a market that can’t be neglected.”
Chen said the coronavirus could speed up formation of regional economic blocs, with three likely to emerge in North America, Europe and East Asia.
“China will be the centre of gravity in the East Asia bloc … that has been decided by China’s industrial system and the vast market size,” he said.
China has the ability to link Japan and South Korea in the north and Southeast Asia in the south, he added.
Reporting on China’s mask juggernaut; analysing China’s hidden unemployment crisis
The shift was already being reflected in China’s trade relationships. In the first quarter of this year, the Asean bloc replaced the European Union as China’s biggest trade partner.
Ding Yifan, a researcher affiliated with the Development Research Centre under the State Council, said China’s industrial power was too big to fail.
China has proved its international competitiveness in “almost every industrial sector”, from telecoms equipment to high-speed railways, he said, and that competence remained amid the pandemic.
“China’s early days of economic development did rely a lot on foreign investors … and every time Western countries talk about leaving China, China gets really anxious,” Ding said. “But in fact, it doesn’t matter any more. China has built up its own industrial system.”
President Xi Jinping has made “protecting a stable supply chain and a value chain” one of six priorities amid the coronavirus fallout, reflecting the president’s determination to maintain China’s role in the world economy.
Beijing is simultaneously strengthening its commitment to its political model.
Xi said at the last meeting of the Politburo, the centre of power within the Communist Party, that China must make “ideological and work preparations” to respond to changes in the outside world that could last for a long time to come.
The comments were a marked shift from the central leadership’s previous view that China was in a historic “period of strategic opportunity”, a line of thinking that has been fading from official statements since last year.
One populist theory circulating on Chinese social media, dubbed “the Manchus breaking into the Great Wall”, compares China’s role in the world today to that of the Manchu people, who in the 17th century conquered China.
China’s governance, institutions and culture are looked down upon by the US-led liberal democracies just as the Manchu, a nomadic group outside the Great Wall, were seen as barbarians by the Ming dynasty of 1368-1644.
The right option for the Manchu people was not to accept the Ming system, but to develop their own military power to conquer the ruling dynasty. Once the Manchu broke through the Great Wall, their institutions and culture became the standard.
The theory follows that China should use its economic and mercantile might to dominate the world and fight for its own moment of “breaking into the Great Wall”, snatching centre stage and proving the superiority of Chinese governance and institutions over the West.
In a recent article circulated widely on Chinese social media app WeChat, the author Lu Shihan asked: “Why is China always put at a disadvantaged position in global public discourse, why do so many people believe China-bashing information from Western countries and why is no one giving us fair recognition, even [after] we have achieved so much? Why can’t we win other people’s recognition of our culture, even when we are already the No 2 economy?”
Lu said the answer lay in that China was culturally different from the US and Europe.
“China is seen as a barbarian country just like the Ming saw the Manchu as barbarians – whatever we do will be seen as wrong,” Lu said.
China’s best chance of prospering was by growing its economic might and helping Chinese companies conquer the world market with Chinese products — just as the Manchu conquered China with their warhorses, the author said.